Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸Ä¡ºÎ ¹ßÄ¡ ÈÄ Áï½Ã ½Ä¸³ ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû ºÐ¼®

A clinical study on implantation of the marginal bone loss after the posterior immediate implants

Journal of Dental Implant Research 2016³â 35±Ç 1È£ p.9 ~ 16
ÃÖ±â°ü, ÆØÁØ¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ±â°ü ( Choi Ki-Kwan ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
ÆØÁØ¿µ ( Paeng Jun-Young ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú

Abstract


Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of marginal bone loss of the maxillary and manbibular posterial immediate implants and analyse the possible influence of different conditions.

Materials and Methods: A total of 89 patients (67 men and 21 women) received 107 short implants between 2013 and 2015. The potential influence of different variables (cause of extraction, implant diameter, length, location, surgical procedure, width of extraction socket, general disease, additional bone grafting procedure) were studied based on the medical records and oral radiographs.

Results: Out of 107 immediate implants, none was lost after mean observation time of 12 months and the cumulative survival rate was 100%. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.09 mm on 3 month, 0.05 mm on 6 month and 0.03 mm on 24 months. Implant type and extraction cause and other factors had an impact on marginal bone loss (P£¼0.05).

Conclusions: Immediate implants is considered as an effective and safe treatment option on most situations, even in atrophic jaws and with general disease.

Å°¿öµå

Immediate implant; Marginal bone loss

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸